You are viewing 1 of your 1 free articles. For unlimited access take a risk-free trial
How effective is walking as a recovery and fitness maintenance mode for injured runners? SPB provides evidence for why it’s better than you might imagine
Running as an endurance sport has many upsides. Not only is it simple, requiring minimal kit and an activity that can be performed anytime, anywhere, it’s also an extremely time efficient activity for building aerobic fitness. Unfortunately, there is a significant downside and that’s the risk of a running related injury (RRI).
Data shows that a non-elite runner, running more than five miles per week can expect a 66% chance of becoming injured in a 24-month period – even when that runner has been injury free for the previous six months(1). Moreover, more than half of those who do get injured in this period will experience more than one injury! In fact, the injury risks may be even higher; a study published just two months ago investigated the injury rates in 274 recreational runners with no recent injury. It found that over half (52%) experienced a running related injury in a 12-month follow-up period(2).
When injury does strike in runners, the immediate need is a cessation of training, a period of rest, then recovery/rehab. Minor injuries such as a slight tendon niggle may only require a few days away from training followed by a measured return to running. Other injuries such as knee ligament damage, calf strain, Achilles rupture, hamstring tear, stress fracture etc may take a lot longer to heal - anything ranging from a few weeks to many months. This can be very challenging for runners, especially if it involves pulling out of an event for which preparations are well underway. Even more frustrating is the prospect of plummeting running fitness due to the process of ‘detraining’ – where all those hard-won fitness gains in training gradually evaporate away. [NB: for an in-depth discussion of detraining and what happens when training ceases, see this article.]
Unsurprisingly, when a running injury strikes that requires an extended layoff, the first thought of most injured runners is ‘how can I minimize my fitness losses while I’m unable to run?’ This will depend to some extend on the nature of the injury. However, once the initial pain and inflammation has subsided, options such as cycling, swimming, rowing or training in the gym on various cardiovascular training machines are all commonly employed. The problem however is that none of these options compare to the simplicity and convenience of running, which makes their use more onerous to pursue for the already stressed runner.
There is however one (often overlooked) fitness maintenance option that is simple, convenient, free and that has a fair degree of overlap with the running muscles in terms of specificity – and that’s walking. Although it’s not particularly fashionable as a fitness activity, walking actually has a lot going for it. For starters, it is quite literally the most natural form of motion known to man. Every single able-bodied person on this planet walks, and in terms of participation, no other exercise even comes close. Secondly, its low impact nature makes it ideal for runners seeking to minimize fitness losses without undue physiological stress on joints and muscles(3,4). Thirdly, and as mentioned above, the musculoskeletal movement patterns involved in walking and running are (self-evidently) quite similar, with the main difference being the greater relative involvement of the ankle and calf muscle in walking compared to the greater knee and quadriceps involvement in running(5). Nevertheless, this overall similarity helps to increase the transfer of training effect – ie helps to give walking training a high degree of specificity to running fitness.
At this point, runners might be wondering how a relatively gentle activity such as walking can be beneficial to help maintain (or reduce losses to) running fitness. It’s true that most people tend to assume that harder exercise automatically means better exercise. But following this logic, we’d all be X-country skiing for aerobic fitness and Olympic power lifting for strength, which is obviously absurd!
It actually turns out that over certain types of terrain, walking can be very energetic indeed (see later). But the key point to remember is that the gentle nature of walking is precisely what makes it an ideal activity to help injured runners to get back on the road. Let’s also recap on the other benefits walking as an alternative to running can offer:
The amount of energy (and therefore the oxygen demand) required for walking is not just a function of walking speed – it also depends on the gradient. That leisurely 3mph stroll on the flat soon turns into a hard slog up a 1 in 5 or 20% gradient. Runners can use this fact to boost the intensity of a walking workout to elevate heart rates enough to ensure the workout delivers aerobic benefits. Take an 80kg adult for example; table 1 below shows the impact that adding gradient into a walking workout can have on the calorie per hour burn rate(6).
To give you feel for these figures, an adult of any weight walking at 4mph up a 1 in 6 hill raises their metabolism to around 13 METS – ie the calorie burn rate and oxygen consumption is 13 times higher than at rest. That’s a fairly challenging workout; a well-conditioned endurance athlete with a maximum oxygen uptake of over 60mls.kg-1.min-1 walking at this speed and gradient would have to work at nearly 70% of their VO2max to stay with the pace!
Walking Speed |
Gradient |
|||||
|
Flat |
4% |
8% |
12% |
16% |
20% |
3mph |
270 |
391 |
526 |
662 |
790 |
925 |
4mph |
400 |
579 |
759 |
930 |
1110 |
1297 |
5mph |
530 |
769 |
979 |
1200 |
1410 |
1665 |
It’s not just gradient and speed that affect the energy demand during walking. Get off a tarmac road or pavement, and for any given speed and gradient, energy output rises dramatically. Table 2 below gives correction factors for different terrains(7). Multiplying the speed/gradient figure by the correction factor gives you an indication of how much energy you’d need to maintain your speed up the same gradient over different terrain. For example, walking at 4mph on a flat smooth surface such as pavement burns 400cals per hour (for an 80kg adult). For the same speed over a flat ploughed field, the energy requirement would rise to 1.5 x 400 = 600cals per hour.
Terrain |
Correction Factor |
Paved road or smooth track |
1.0 |
Ploughed field |
1.5 |
Hard snow |
1.6 |
Soft sand |
1.8 |
* data from Richmond, Potter and Santee: ‘Terrain factors for predicting walking and load carriage energy costs: review and refinement’ J. Sport Hum. Perform., 3 (3) (2015), pp. 1-26
In fact, even small changes in surface can have a significant impact on energy expenditure while walking. In a 2021 study by the US Department of Defense and US National Institutes of Health, researchers investigated and compared the impact of terrain type on energy expenditure when walking on sidewalks, dirt, gravel, grass, and woodchips(8). The results showed that walking on a flat surface of woodchips at 2.8mph required 27% more energy expenditure than walking on the sidewalk at the same speed (see figure 1).
One of the main battles for runners suffering an extended layoff due to injury is weight management. Significant weight gain not only makes restarting training harder, it also increases the risk of a subsequent injury(9). Any alternative activity during a layoff period should therefore be one that increases energy burn sufficiently to minimize weight gain. Many people assume that walking doesn’t really burn up that many calories but table 3 below shows how body weight and walking speed influence energy expenditure. Compare the ‘calories per hour’ figures for brisk walking (4-5mph) to other sports and fitness activities and you begin to see that walking can actually be a quite effective form of aerobic exercise, especially if performed on hillier or rougher terrain!
Speed (mph) on the flat |
Body Weight (kgs) |
||||||
36 |
45 |
54 |
64 |
73 |
82 |
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0 |
114 |
132 |
156 |
174 |
192 |
210 |
228 |
3.0 |
162 |
186 |
216 |
240 |
264 |
288 |
318 |
4.0 |
210 |
246 |
282 |
312 |
348 |
384 |
420 |
5.0 |
258 |
312 |
354 |
390 |
444 |
498 |
544 |
It’s tempting to think of walking as too gentle to count as ‘real’ exercise, but how does it actually stack up compared to other sports and activities? All the figures given below are the energy costs in calories per hour for a mythical 12-stone adult. You can see below that even walking on the flat is respectably energetic, being more energy intense than sports such as weight training and gymnastics. Add in a bit of gradient or challenging terrain however and the intensity skyrockets!
Activity |
Approximate Energy Cost (calories per hour) |
Running (6 minutes per mile) |
1140 |
Brisk walking (up 1 in 8 gradient, 4.5mph) |
1080 |
Brisk walking (snow or sand, 4.5mph) |
740 |
Jogging (10 minutes per mile) |
660 |
Brisk walking (over rough ground, 4.5mph) |
615 |
Swimming (crawl, steady) |
588 |
Downhill skiing |
500 |
Canoeing (racing) |
456 |
Badminton |
450 |
Cycling (leisure 9.4mph) |
444 |
Brisk walking (flat level terrain, 4.5mph) |
410 |
Cricket (bowling) |
402 |
Weight training |
380 |
Gymnastics |
306 |
Canoeing (leisure) |
201 |
In terms of the physiological demands, the data is clear: with the right gradients and terrain, walking can provide the necessary physiological stimulus to help maintain cardiovascular fitness (or at least minimize losses), and a sufficient calorie burn to help stave off weight gain. Even better, the overlap between walking and running muscle recruitment patterns means that there is a significant transfer of training effect, but without the harsh impact or loading that might interfere with the healing and recovery process. Despite the above however, caution is still required; having suffered a painful knee injury, you wouldn’t want to (or even be able to) head out to walk the hills the next day. Here then are some practical tips for injured runners, but bear in mind, they are generalized recommendations. You should always seek help from a qualified physiotherapist for more specific advice:
1. Am J Sports Med. 2018 Jul;46(9):2211-2221
2. PLoS One. 2023 Aug 17;18(8):e0288814. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288814. eCollection 2023
3. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1996 Jul;11(5):253-259. doi: 10.1016/0268-0033(95)00068-2
4. Am J Sports Med. 2021 Jul;49(8):2227-2237
5. Instr Course Lect. 1995;44:497-506
6. McArdle Katch & Katch ’Exercise Physiology: Nutrition, Energy, and Human Performance’ – 8th edition. Wolters Kluwer Publishing 2014
7. J. Sport Hum. Perform., 3 (3) (2015), pp. 1-26
8. PLoS One. 2021; 16(1): e0228682
9. BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 6;9(9):e032627
Today you have the chance to join a group of athletes, and sports coaches/trainers who all have something special in common...
They use the latest research to improve performance for themselves and their clients - both athletes and sports teams - with help from global specialists in the fields of sports science, sports medicine and sports psychology.
They do this by reading Sports Performance Bulletin, an easy-to-digest but serious-minded journal dedicated to high performance sports. SPB offers a wealth of information and insight into the latest research, in an easily-accessible and understood format, along with a wealth of practical recommendations.
*includes 3 coaching manuals
Get Inspired
All the latest techniques and approaches
Sports Performance Bulletin helps dedicated endurance athletes improve their performance. Sense-checking the latest sports science research, and sourcing evidence and case studies to support findings, Sports Performance Bulletin turns proven insights into easily digestible practical advice. Supporting athletes, coaches and professionals who wish to ensure their guidance and programmes are kept right up to date and based on credible science.