You are viewing 1 of your 1 free articles. For unlimited access take a risk-free trial
Andrew Sheaff asks whether bodyweight training can deliver the same kind of strength gains as using free weights, and looks at new evidence
Just 50 years ago, strength training of any type was barely practiced. That’s because not only was strength training not recognized as a training tool, it also wasn’t an accepted activity in the general population. These days, times have changed; strength training is both considered a required component of sports preparation, and necessary for healthy aging.
Strength training now an accepted part of culture and there are many different forms of strength training that are widely practiced. These include free weights, machines, resistance bands, kettlebells, and even bodyweight resistance. This can create a conundrum for some athletes because it can lead to confusion as to which approach is going to be most effective. Athletes may find some types of strength training more appealing than others, but equally, they don’t want to waste their time or effort on a strategy that’s less effective.
Further, just because strength training is considered mainstream, it doesn’t mean that it’s easily accessible to those who haven’t yet begun to do so. This is particularly true of free weights. Some people simply find free weights intimidating and are hesitant to strength train as a result. If they believe that free weights are the only way to get strong, they may choose to do nothing instead of finding an equally effective alternative. Others simply don’t have access to free weights and if they are under the impression that free weights are required to get stronger, they may choose not to engage in strength training at all.
Bodyweight strength training has been proposed as a solution to this conundrum, but because there is no external loading, some people view bodyweight training as inferior. But is it inferior? Is bodyweight training an effective introductory option for those that are intimidated by free weights, or simply don’t have access to them? And can bodyweight strength training be an effective alternative for more advanced athletes that don’t have access to free weights for some reason? By comparing the outcomes of bodyweight strength training and free weight strength training, we can start to provide answers to these questions, and now a new study has investigated exactly this question?
In this study, a group of researchers from Japan took 37 healthy individuals and had them perform an 8-week strength training program where the subjects exercised twice per week. The subjects were split into two groups. One group performed traditional weight training, exercising at an intensity of 70% of their maximum strength, performing 3 x sets of 8-12 repetitions. They performed the following exercises: squats, bench press, deadlift, dumbbell row and lat pulls. The other training group performed nine different bodyweight training exercises: leg raises, squats, lunge, single-leg Romanian deadlift, rear raise, rowing, overhead shoulder mobility exercise (shoulder press), dips, and push-ups. They performed 1-2 sets of 10-15 repetitions per exercise depending on the exercise and the week of the program. All training sessions were supervised by the researchers.
Before and after the intervention, all the participants performed two primary tests. The first was a knee extension maximal voluntary contraction torque assessment. This is a very simple way to measure the strength of the quadriceps muscle, which does not involve much skill. By removing the skill component, it’s easier to assess the strength of the muscle without any interference from other factors. The second test involved a magnetic resonance scan of the thigh. This scan allowed the researchers to determine the size of the thigh and what type of tissues were responsible for how much of any thigh size increase. Both tests were performed prior to the beginning of the training intervention, as well as after.
The most important finding from the study was that both training groups significantly improved the muscle mass of the rectus femoris, one of the most important quadriceps muscles. Regardless of whether weight training or bodyweight training was performed, significant muscle growth occurred, and the degree of muscle growth was similar regardless of the type of training used. For those looking to improve muscle mass therefore, it appears that both free weights and bodyweight training are effective in doing so, and either can be an option for those looking to develop the size of their legs.
Muscle strength also improved in both groups, with a slightly larger change in the weight training group, although this extra gain in strength was small (see figure 2). As with muscle mass, both protocols proved effective in improving strength. While it’s understood that weight training will improve muscle strength, it’s less accepted that bodyweight strength training can do so. However, this study seems to affirm that bodyweight strength training can improve strength, and nearly as well as weight training.
The big takeaway is that if individuals find themselves unwilling or unable to use traditional strength training methods, they don’t have to sacrifice the important improvements that come with resistance training. They can expect to get similar results using bodyweight strength training exercises that cover the entire body. For those short on time, experience, or equipment, it’s exactly what’s needed.
It’s important to note however that the subjects in this study were all relatively untrained. A critic could question whether these results would apply to more experienced athletes – since any training intervention would be likely to improve performance in untrained individuals. However, for those individuals that are just beginning their strength training, even if they have an otherwise extensive training background (for example in endurance) , one can expect to see similar improvements in strength from a bodyweight strength training intervention. Because it’s a novel training stimulus, it’s still likely to create a similarly robust training response. Novel stimuli will almost always lead to adaptation, even if the individual in question is already highly trained in other areas.
For those hesitant to make the jump to lifting weights, bodyweight training can therefore serve as an excellent introduction, without sacrificing any of the potential benefits. It’s a less intimidating form of strength training, and it also minimizes the costs associated with beginning a new training program. Even better, bodyweight training can be performed anywhere, no equipment is required, and the exercise technique is relatively simple and straight forward. For those just getting started, it’s a great way to do so.
Other individuals may find bodyweight strength training to be particularly beneficial if they are without access to weight training equipment. As the bodyweight training stimulus in this study was sufficient to improve muscle mass in untrained individuals, it’s likely to help maintain muscle mass in trained individuals, or at least slow the decline. Even in the latter case, it’s an infinitely better outcome than simply stopping resistance training. Therefore, even advanced athletes can benefit from bodyweight strength training in the appropriate context.
In summary, effective training is all about having options and using these different options available as and when the circumstances warrant. This study demonstrates that bodyweight strength training is an effective stimulus for the development of muscle mass. For those new to strength bodyweight strength is a terrific introduction, and for those with a more extensive background, bodyweight strength training is an effective alternative that can be used when necessary.
1. Exp Physiol. 2023 Jul;108(7):975-985. doi: 10.1113/EP090655. Epub 2023 May 3
Today you have the chance to join a group of athletes, and sports coaches/trainers who all have something special in common...
They use the latest research to improve performance for themselves and their clients - both athletes and sports teams - with help from global specialists in the fields of sports science, sports medicine and sports psychology.
They do this by reading Sports Performance Bulletin, an easy-to-digest but serious-minded journal dedicated to high performance sports. SPB offers a wealth of information and insight into the latest research, in an easily-accessible and understood format, along with a wealth of practical recommendations.
*includes 3 coaching manuals
Get Inspired
All the latest techniques and approaches
Sports Performance Bulletin helps dedicated endurance athletes improve their performance. Sense-checking the latest sports science research, and sourcing evidence and case studies to support findings, Sports Performance Bulletin turns proven insights into easily digestible practical advice. Supporting athletes, coaches and professionals who wish to ensure their guidance and programmes are kept right up to date and based on credible science.